It’s crunch time for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. Known by the acronym S-CHIP, the program is set to expire within days, but President Bush and Democrats in Congress remain divided over its future funding. Bush used his weekly radio address to reiterate his veto threat against the bill passed by Democrats.

“The proposal congressional leaders are pushing would raise taxes on working Americans and would raise spending by $35 to $50 billion,” Bush said. “Their proposal would result in taking a program meant to help poor children and turning it into one that covers children in some households with incomes of up to $83,000 a year. And their proposal would move millions of children who now have private health insurance into government-run health care.

“Our goal should be to move children who have no health insurance to private coverage — not to move children who already have private health insurance to government coverage.”

He vowed to continue working toward a compromise and urged Congress to send him a “clean, temporary extension” before S-CHIP funding expires Sept. 30.

Pennsylvania Gov. Edward Rendell chastised the Bush administration for making renewal of S-CHIP a “partisan issue” and threatening a veto of the bill. “The health of our children is far too important for partisan politics as usual,” Rendell said in the Democrats’ weekly radio address. “A veto battle in Washington would expose millions of children to the risk of losing insurance. That’s simply unacceptable.”

He noted that governors in both parties have been working together to expand health insurance coverage for children. He said the administration approved an expansion of Pennsylvania’s “Cover All Kids” program. “And now we are providing coverage to 93 percent of the children in families where the income is less than 250″ of the federal poverty level.”

But Rendell added that the administration recently changed S-CHIP rules in a way “that could halt the efforts of these and other states to cover more kids.” He urged Americans to contact the White House and their lawmakers and urge them to support legislation to reauthorize the S-CHIP program.

Categories: Podcast of the Week, Pennsylvania, White House, Health, Weekly Radio Address, Edward Rendell, Vetoes

The Politics Of Iraq, In Video

May 4, 2007, 7:07am

First came the veto, now come the political ads.

Earlier this week, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee released an advertisement critical of President Bush for “vetoing a new direction in Iraq.”

Now the Republican National Committee has released a video that accuses Democrats of playing politics with emergency military spending.

“Stop the politics. Fund the troops,” says the ad, which was released after the House on Wednesday upheld the veto of a bill that would have conditioned more funding to troops in Iraq on a timetable for bringing those troops home.

The presidential campaign of Democrat John Edwards also is delivering its anti-war, anti-veto message through video — and in a unique way. The campaign invited its supporters to share their thoughts on film, and the campaign then spliced them into a “We, The People” ad that encouraged Congress to stand firm against Bush.

Earlier this year, meanwhile, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee aired an ad that criticized Republican senators for stalling debate on the future of the Iraq war.

Categories: Military, Iraq, White House, Budget, AdWatch, Vetoes

Six years into his presidency, George W. Bush is channeling the veto spirit of his father, former President George H.W. Bush.

Until this week, President Bush had vetoed only one bill. He vetoed his second on Tuesday, rejecting a measure that would have set a timetable for removing U.S. troops from Iraq. And then today, Bush issued a veto threat against a “hate crimes” bill just hours before the Democratic-led House passed it on a 237-180 vote. The legislation would expand the categories of violent acts punishable as hate crimes to those based on the victims’ sexual orientation, gender or disability.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga.

All of the veto news this week is reminiscent of the presidency of Bush’s father from 1989 to 1993. The elder Bush clashed constantly with the Democrats who had controlled both chambers of Congress for the better part of four decades. He vetoed 44 bills in four years — all but one of which were upheld.

If this week is any indication of what the current President Bush can expect for the remainder of his second term, it could be a long two years.

Categories: Maryland, Georgia, White House, Civil Rights, Gay Rights, Steny Hoyer, Crime, Vetoes, John Lewis

House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo.: “The message we send to the world matters. The message we send to our troop matters. This bill needs to be as clean as possible; it needs to be straightforward.”

House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio: Terrorists have “made Iraq the central front in their war with us. And if we walk out of Iraq, if we don’t give this plan a chance to succeed, we encourage the terrorists. … They’ll be able to recruit new people all over the world. They’ll haven a safe have in Iraq itself. We will destablize the entire Middle East, including the very existence of Israel. And who doesn’t believe that if we don’t deal with the terrorists in Iraq that we won’t be dealing with them on the streets of America?”

Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas: “The president can veto our plan for a safe, orderly, phased redeployment from Iraq, but he cannot veto reality. Our troops are coming home. It’s just a matter of how much blood and money will be spent before they do.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.: “The Congress will not support an open-ended commitment … to a war without end. The president wants a blank check; the Congress will not give it to him. … We are substituting the judgment of this Congress for [the president’s] failed judgment.”

Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn.: “He called [the bill] a prescription for chaos and confusion. I ask: How is that different from what we have now?”

Plus the conservative Heritage Foundation answers the question, “Are we in a long war?”

Categories: Military, California, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Texas, Producer's Picks, Iraq, White House, Timothy Walz, Nancy Pelosi, Budget, Roy Blunt, John Boehner, Lloyd Doggett, Vetoes

About | Contact AirCongress


Blog World Featured Speaker

Media Bloggers Association

Beltway Insiders Ad Network

Government Relations Blog Network