The ‘Do Nothing’ Democrats In Congress

October 17, 2007, 10:12pm

When Democrats were in the congressional minority in 2006, they trotted out the familiar “do nothing” label to attack the Republican-led Congress and President Bush. Now Democrats control Congress and the label is on the other partisan lapel.

Bush didn’t actually use the phrase “do nothing” in a press conference today, but he certainly embraced the spirit of that slam that dates all the way back to the days of President Harry S Truman after World War II.

“We’re now more than halfway through October, and the new leaders in Congress have had more than nine months to get things done for the American people,” Bush said. “Unfortunately, they haven’t managed to pass many important bills. Now the clock is winding down, and in some key areas, Congress is just getting started.”

He criticized Democrats for failing to craft a bill on the State Children’s Health Insurance Program acceptable to him, for its resistance to his ideas on conducting anti-terrorism surveillance without warrants, and for failing to send Bush any of the annual appropriations bills to sign before the beginning of fiscal 2008 on Oct. 1. Other complaints covered housing, trade, veterans affairs and judicial nominations.

Bush further chastised Congress for voting on a “counterproductive” resolution to condemn the long-defunct Ottoman Empire for the mass killings of Armenians beginning in 1915.

See the full transcript of Bush’s question-and-answer session with reporters here, or listen to the audio of the press conference.

Categories: Podcast of the Week, White House, Health, Terrorism, Law & Judiciary, Budget, Trade, Foreign Affairs, History, Veterans Affairs, Intelligence, Children

Job creation and exports growth are going strong in the U.S. economy and new trade deals will make things even better, President Bush said today in an appeal for implementation of pending deals with the Latin American countries of Colombia, Panama and Peru.

“These three agreements will expand America’s access to 75 million customers,” Bush said in his weekly radio address. “These 75 million customers are the equivalent of the populations of California, Colorado, Ohio, Michigan, Tennessee, and Massachusetts combined.”

Here are the benefits that he said each deal offer the United States:

  • Colombia: “The free trade agreement with Colombia would immediately eliminate tariffs on more than 80 percent of American industrial and consumer exports. It would provide significant new duty-free access for American crops.”
  • Panama: “This agreement will immediately eliminate tariffs on 88 percent of our industrial and consumer goods exports to Panama. It will increase access for American farmers and ranchers. And it will open opportunities for American businesses to participate in the multi-billion dollar project to expand the Panama Canal. “
  • Peru: “The free trade agreement would immediately eliminate most of Peru’s industrial tariffs, as well as many of its barriers to U.S. agriculture exports.”

Categories: Producer's Picks, Agriculture, Weekly Radio Address, Trade

Mike Huckabee On America’s Business

October 5, 2007, 7:48pm

The National Association of Manufacturers interviewed Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee for its “America’s Business” vodcast today. Huckabee vowed to end all taxes on productivity and called for action to address the unfair trade balance that China has with the United States.

Categories: Taxes, Trade, Mike Huckabee

A Capitol Scouting Report On Free Trade

September 25, 2007, 8:29pm

First up in Congress is the U.S. trade agreement in Peru. Three more agreements, with Colombia, Panama and South Korea, are in the que. “The [Bush] administration places a high priority — the highest priority — on the passage of each of these four trading agreements … in the months to come,” Reuben Jeffrey, the State Department’s undersecretary for economic, energy and agricultural affairs, said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal.

Categories: Trade

A new report of 46,000 job losses in manufacturing in August is “devastating news,” especially on top of the 3 million jobs lost since 2000, according to the National Association of Manufacturers. NAM President John Engler blamed the declines on “a cost strructure that’s out of control.”

“Thirty-two percent higher costs in this country, decisions not made in Beijing or Brussels but here at home, the lax of an energy strategy, a tax burden that’s the highest of the developed world, regulatory and legal litigation costs out of control — those are polilcy choices that have to be addressed,” Engler said. “Regardless of who’s controlled the Congress or even who’s been in the White House, we have not been aggressive as a nation in facing up.”

Categories: Labor, Energy, Taxes, Economy, Trade

About | Contact AirCongress


Blog World Featured Speaker

Media Bloggers Association

Beltway Insiders Ad Network

Government Relations Blog Network